University of Jos Institutional Repository >
Health Sciences >
Surgery >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1485
|
Title: | Experience with Impacted Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region at a Nigerian Teaching Hospital |
Other Titles: | Experience De L'inclusion D'un Corps Etranger Dans La Region Maxillo-Faciale Dans Un Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Au Nigeria |
Authors: | Olusanya, A. A. Aladelusl, T. O. Olanloye, O. M. |
Keywords: | Displaced tooth |
Issue Date: | 2015 |
Publisher: | Journal of West African College of Surgeons |
Series/Report no.: | Vol. 5;No. 3; Pp 1 - 15 |
Abstract: | Background: The maxillofacial region has a complex anatomy and is replete with orifices and tissue dead spaces
which could harbor foreign bodies. It is important to identify a foreign body impaction when it occurs, as it can be a
source of persistent pain, infection and suppuration, it could also further migrate to adjacent regions of the body.
Aim: The aim of this study is to report the clinical presentation, the prevalence, diagnosis, management and
outcome of maxillofacial foreign body impaction in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Methodology: This is a prospective clinic based epidemiological study carried out at the Department of Oral and
Maxillofacial surgery, University College hospital, lbadan, Nigeria. Data of all the patients presenting with foreign
body impaction department from January 2008 to July 2013 were recorded into a proforma. The data which
included demographics, type of foreign body impaction, predisposing factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis,
treatment provided and outcome were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 19.
Results: Atotal of 5571 patients presented in the clinic during the study period with 16 of the patients presenting
with foreign body impaction in the maxillofacial region prevalence rate of 0.29% There were 8 (50%) males and 8
(50%) females with male/female ratio of 1:1.The age ranged from .. to .. with a mean age of 21.89+/-17.047years.
latrogenically displaced tooth 4 (25%) was the commonest foreign body impacted in the maxillofacial region while
the submandibular region 3 (18.8%) was the commonest site. Majority 6 (40%) of the patients had retrieval of the
foreign body under local anaesthesia.
Conclusion: Foreign body impactions in the maxillofacial region are not common and are varied in nature. Their
management is straightforward when they are impacted in an accessible and superficial site otherwise their
diagnosis could be difficult and their management more challenging. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1485 |
Appears in Collections: | Surgery
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|